@wfain was really hoping people had just forgotten that card existed

@wfain Nice, are you running It MD? It sounds cool against blue decks too, with their delves, snaps And yawg wills. I mean, not good like "tutor for It And play", more like a Very acceptable colateral effect for making dredge better. I've been considering a 4th Thalia too. It's been great against blue decks, And bad case scenario we just discard It to Bazaar or survival (bad, not worst since worst case is get 4 in hand without discard outlet And as I speak it already seems like a kinda bad idea, but I dont know..)

@gutocmtt yeah. I’ve been running this lately:

@ritter against Outcome I cut a Survival, because it is slower and you’re more interested in resolving Thalia/Thorn. Then I shave 1 each of VV, Hollow, and Rootwala, also cut basic Forest since they don’t play Wasteland.

Vs Jeskai I do very little if anything (just bring a couple ways to kill RiP/Leyline). Chalice comes out, as does at least 1 Hollow b/c of Dack.

Vs Dredge: Chalice, Thorn, Thalia all come out.

Vs Shops: a Rootwala and a Survival come out since they are slow and not as impactful. Thalia/Thorn as well (unless it is more like Stax, then keep those in on the play at the least)

I take Chalice out on the draw vs everything but Outcome.

like a lot of the ideas being tossed around here. just finished a 4-1 league with my only loss to @GutoCmtt in the mirror match 🙂

SB'ing for me has been something like:
shops: -thalias, thorn, chalice, queller, anger, 1 survival... +plows, claim, stony, flux
PO: -birds, forest, mandrills, anger, 1 squee?... +stony, mindbreak trap, claim, plows. GY hate can be okay if they show theyre on a yawgwill version; remorseful cleric is one of my GY sb slots now so that is an option.
Dredge: -birds, chalice, queller, mandrills, forest, thorn... +plows, claim, traps, priests/crypt/remoseful cleric etc.
Blue: -1 bird, 1 hollow one (against red), maybe chalice... +plows, claim, maybe remorseful cleric.

Finished 3 leagues so far, 3-2; 5-0; 4-1.

My losses were to dredge, RUG Oath, and PO. The dredge pilot got some crazy good draws, hitting just the right combination of cards to pull off a cabal pit for priest and immediately start going crazy with dredgers while still holding FoW backup for my rav trap. PO had turn 1 vault/key on the play game 1 and then assembled vault/key turn 3 through a thalia after forcing a stony silence and tinkering for key with vault in hand.

For my crazy win compilation, I beat a PO pilot with tinker/BS turn 2 and an Oath pilot that managed to pull a turn 3 grisel and turn 4 inferno titan.

Wonder was amazing against just about everything, flying over ravager shops and mentors. I am currently running 3 birds and 3 ESG, which felt good in general. 3 squees were fantastic, pulling me out of many stalemates and slow board positions. Lil' squee even got cast a few times after chump blocking to be my second creature in a turn to resurrect vengevines.

For reference, my current list: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/1260503#online

@ritter Well done! I can’t imagine playing that many Squee! I don’t even like having two 😂

I think I'm going to try a straight bant list, cutting 2 grudges, 2 taigas, 3 birds, 1 ESG, 1 squee, and the 1 anger. Going up to 4 hierarch leaves me with potentially 2 land slots and then 4 additional spots to fill. Additionally, with a straight bant manabase is it worth running the ruby? Maybe the ruby gets cut and the third ESG stays in?

Ideally I'd like cards that hit PO, Jeskai Mentor, or possibly Ravager Shops (the loss of 2 grudge should be made up for in some way I guess?). Having a way to bounce a blightsteel might be nice, possibly adding back dryad militant could be sweet, or even a second wonder has crossed my mind. One card I'm definitely interested in trying in some number is phyrexian revoker, being able to tutor up an answer for vault/key or a planeswalker. It seems that spell queller, although common in these lists, has been hit or miss, so I'm still bouncing around some ideas.

I also feel like I'm missing some ESG interactions. Besides it being like a green lotus petal that dodges spheres, I've had situations where I was able to survival up an ESG as an additional green mana source to pitch another creature to survival to get up to 3 discards in a turn for hollow one, but otherwise I can't tell if I'm missing some sweet interaction.

last edited by Ritter

@ritter i had some bant lists posted earlier in this thread that are probably still just as relevant. going into a 4th or 5th color is good against combo decks, as thalia alone is not really enough. I ended up on judge's familiar and spell queller, but meddling mage (interesting!), revoker, bigger thalia (probably too slow/low impact), spirit of the lab (awkward), teeg (seems decent, doesn't stop tinker/mentor/vault), canonist (doesn't slow us down that much if you end chains with hollow one?), etc could also fill those slots.

I don't think you need too many off color moxen, and in general would want 2 spirit guides minimum, and 3 would be best imo. Turning extra creatures into discards/mana is very good. the interactions you mentioned are the main ones, but you can also EOT turn creatures into spirit guides to gear up for a bigger next turn, or power out a hate card turn 1, or beat down for 2 against control decks.

if you want cards against shops, the big idiots are pretty good - goyf, mandrills. not too many of the hatebears overlap, unfortunately. kataki is a card, but sort of fragile in the age of ballista.

the Gruw lists i ended up on were because i wanted more game against PO, and grudge certainly does help, but the matchup is still hard. I'm not sure you can stay Bant and still have a great matchup against PO. It always seems like you just die to a force of will into anything. Grudge at least will try to keep them low on resources and going too broken with outcome (in theory anyways...).

if i were to test more, i might try a 3rd squee and maybe meddling mage over something like Anger, even in a red list.

Anyways, congrats on the finishes and please let us know how things keep evolving!!

@ritter @kaluma
I don’t find I have any real trouble with 4 or even 5 colors. Very few decks are running more than just Strip Mine online. The reason I don’t have much trouble is I try to keep what I want in a particular matchup down to 2 non-green colors. For example- against PO I want W and R, so I don’t worry about trying to set up Wonder or Ancestral. Against Shops I want R for sure, and then I just lean into U or W depending on whether I draw Flux or Stony.

I'm trying the DRS (I actually went 100% on DRS) and I'm finding it to be better than birds. I didn't get to try hierarch, but I don't think I've ever missed his trigger. For the first turns of the game it's very good at generating mana (having lands in the GY) and the collateral effect of his other activations is pretty relevant. I'm really liking it.

@gutocmtt that’s interesting. I like having DRS, but I’m not sure enough fetches are played in Vintage to support all 4 (especially in the matches where I really want the mana guys to work early, like Shops).

Hello all,

I've recently picked up this deck to run through my local game stores and some non-competitive games online. I have adopted a slightly different approach to the deck to the posters previously in this thread. The deck functions differently, as it relies on going 'all in' a lot less often.

The initial inspiration came from what has become commonly known as the Brian Kelly oath variant (@brianpk80), which eschews the pure combo of something like Fenton Oath for inevitability and a dual role as a planeswalker control deck.

The major differences between the two archetypes (Oath / Survival) are numerous, however both share a propensity to function well below acceptable levels when facing early hate (albeit slightly different hate). The solution to this problem in Oath was traditionally to fight hate with cards (as Dredge would do with its own hate problems), however the major innovation recently was to sidestep the hate and simply cast the creatures being hated out. Although I have seen other post that Survival is not a purely graveyard based deck, which I agree with, it does function best when utilising the graveyard.

Thus I took the inital shell of Survival, and tried to streamline a deck that relied on raw power G1, whilst switching to a Blue control deck after.

The cards that I pinpointed to having limited impact post graveyard hate are Bazaar and Vengevine (albeit still castable as a 4/4 for 4)

The intial 20 cards as identified by @wfain are the core of the deck G1:

Survival Package
4 Bazaar
4 SotF
4 Vengevine
4 Hollow One
4 Basking Rootwalla

Planeswalker Package:
2 Dack Fayden

Blue/Green Control Package:
1 Ancestral
1 Brainstorm
4 FoW
1 Deep Analysis
1 Gitaxian Probe
1 Ponder
4 Preordain
1 Time Walk
1 Sylvan Library

Alternate Win Con:
1 Monastery Mentor

5 moxen
1 Black Lotus
4 Tropical Island
2 Volcanic Island
2 Tundra
6 Fetchlands

1 Ancient Grudge

4 Containment Priest
1 Kataki
2 Scab-Clan
2 Energy Flux
2 Mindbreak Trap
2 Pyroblast
1 Island
1 Stony Silence

As you can see above the concept revolves around reducing the number of conditionally good cards (Thalia, Squee, Thorn etc.) for objectively powerful filtering blue cards (Ponder, Preordain, Brainstorm) which allow for a smoother trandition to a blue control deck, light countermagic suite pre-board (Fow) and post-board (pyroblast, mindbreak trap), pure card drawing (Ancestral, Deep Analysis, Sylvan) and of course a fetchland base.

The list if of course rounded off by powerful planeswalkers that in the case of dack play the role of Bazaar 5 and 6, as well as restealing back lost Hollowed ones.

Jace is an alternate win con.

Mentor is the secondary alternate win con.

Thanks for reading and I hope people have a play with these types of possibilities.


last edited by Guest

Maybe I’m wrong but at a glance it looks like you’re just doing two things worse. Aren’t you a worse blue deck and a worse Survival/Bazaar deck? It’s interesting, but honestly I’d cut Survival. You aren’t doing anything with it. Breakthrough or Frantic Search would be better with so few creatures and no bullets to search for. I do, however, think a FoW version should at least consider Prized Amalgam.

last edited by wfain

@wfain said in Survival Salad:

Maybe I’m wrong but at a glance it looks like you’re just doing two things worse. Aren’t you a worse blue deck and a worse Survival/Bazaar deck? It’s interesting, but honestly I’d cut Survival. You aren’t doing anything with it. Breakthrough or Frantic Search would be better with so few creatures and no bullets to search for. I do, however, think a FoW version should at least consider Prized Amalgam.

I have been thinking about a FoW version as well, but I hate to think of what needs to go right to make Prized Amalgam fit into the deck. The only triggers would be Vengevines, and when you start to add other dudes like bloodghast or gravecrawler, you are adding lots more non-blue cards.

If I was going to make a list of immediately good blue cards to add I'd start with Ancestral, Walk, Cruise, Wonder, FoW, Misstep and Judge's Familiar. If you pick 12-16 blue cards to run in the deck to support FoW, you are going to be severely short on creatures to use for Survival and VV recursion unless you just start with 4 Judge's Familiar.

@ritter I played a version with Gravecrawler. It was fine. I think there is a list up in the thread somewhere.

@wfain said in Survival Salad:

@ritter I played a version with Gravecrawler. It was fine. I think there is a list up in the thread somewhere.

I think a list with Gravecrawler and Amalgam could be great, I'm just not convinced you can squeeze FoW in there as well.

I'm thinking of taking the list to a more hatebears place, including 3 MD Thalia and 3 MD Stony Silence to start. With 3 MD Stony Silence, Kataki gets a lot better, so I've been playing one MD over Ancient Grudge cutting red aside from Squee. With this configuration, Manglehorn gets a little worse and harder to cast, so that probably goes to the board or maybe gets cut entirely. Another card that could be good is Grand Abolisher, kinda going the Defense Grid route you see DPS take, running anti-FoW cards instead of FoW itself.

@ritter That’s why I have the Pyroblasts (in addition to countering PO). I moved off Manglehorn a while ago. The 3 mana cards (Leo, Kambal, Queller, etc) are too slow vs Outcome decks. Grudge and Pyroblast are much more functional.


This is where I kinda wanna go for one branch of what this deck could look like. I've already played a few league matches and would cut the grand abolisher as well as the 4th sb stony silence. I feel bad about cutting the stony silence, but I've had them pile up too many times in my hand. I'd also cut the spell queller, it just sits in my hand uncastable most of the time.

The cards I'm using past the core 20 are just an impersonation of a tax package you might find in white eldrazi or shops. All I really want to do is start going crazy with a bazaar or survival as fast as I can while stopping my opponent from going crazier at a faster pace than me. When I lose, the #1 reason is getting FoW'd at the worst possible times and then having no choice but to play draw go until I find more lands that make mana (maybe 3 is too many ESG), or action that can swing me back into the game. I almost want to go back into red to run goblin rabblemaster, a dude that can just take over a game on an unchecked board.

If you're not gonna run a tax package, you can try to run countermagic to try and stall the game to the point where you have flooded the board with VV and hopefully won the game. That list is going to still have that core 20 cards, but past that I can imagine a deck that goes real heavy in blue to support FoW (disputable, but probably 16 cards), or maybe just runs missteps and mindbreak traps.

@ritter if your trying to add goblin rabblemaster, maybe the new Najeela, the blade blossom is for you. She kills way quicker than rabbleman when unimpeded. Worth a thought!

  • 855
  • 179603