@brass-man Please explain why survival would be happy to see this card.
Simply that Survival decks aren't really impacted by this card in a meaningful way. Not that's it's actively good for the Survival player when it's in play - I just meant that you'd rather your opponent have this in their deck than something scarier.
@brass-man does this turn off Rootwalla? Does paying 0 count as paying mana?
While I don't want to speculate on the rules of unreleased cards, I suspect that Lavinia does counter free Hollow Ones and Basking Rootwallas. However, Hollow Ones importance comes in the early game (literally turn 1), when Lavinia, Azorious Renegade is unlikely to be castable. Once you hit the midgame, it's not super important that your free creatures resolve - Lavinia counters them, but they'll still put Vengevines into play.
There will be games where you have a Bazaar of Baghdad but no Survival of the Fittest and Lavinia shutting down a turn 4 Basking Rootwalla would have more impact, I could be underestimating that sort of thing, but it doesn't feel like a winning sideboard plan to me (not without other cards to support it, at least).
@juice-mane said in Single Card Discussion - Lavinia, Azorious Renegade:
It's sad to see the manufacturer of this card game continue to explore the effects that amount to: 'you can't do this' plastered on creatures. Cards that reduce possible interactions between cards tend to contribute to boring games.
If they absolutely needed to print yet another prohibitive card like this, why make it a creature? It's comical to imagine a scenario where this creature with such powerful magical abilities is hitting/stabbing you for 2 life points a turn while simultaneously retaining enough focus to exercise her immense magical powers. At least add a clause where the abilities are turned off when the creature is tapped. Even comic book superheroes need to focus when channeling their powers.
I think I'm fine when they are symmetrical. These one way Leovold effects are stupid and lazy.
It's pretty good against survival. Most of the Hollow ones and rootwallas are not cast on turn 1, it also stops hands that have low land counts to have some progress, stops force of will, late drawn mox/lotus (which can be pretty relevant too). And it stops the half of the survival creatures that containment priest doesn't. Sounds like the card is amazing. If I was playing against survival with it, I'd definitely bring (or keep) it in
This think is going to exhaserbate the mental misstep problem to new level.
Best answers for this card are bolt, plow, fatal push, and likely abrupt decay. 3 of them are countered by mm and then cannot be countered back because of her effect. Dismemeber gets affected by her abilities.
We may very well wind up in a meta where people need to run sudden shock and sulfur elementals to with these over the top hate bears.
@brass-man I think it's a one-sided CotV that hurts a lot of decks turn 1. Building a 4 Lavinia deck that tries to maximize the times it comes into play turn 1 is very viable (using even Petal, for example). Also, even in mid-late game, having Survival not able to chain Rootwallas and Hollow Ones is great. Although Vengevines still come into play if you cycle one Rootwalla into a Hollow One (even with Lavinia into play).
Against Shops, as I said, it's situational at best. If you're on the play having Lavinia turn 1 is great because it acts as a CotV on 0 AND stops turn 1 Spheres, which gives you a turn 2 free of disruption. Against Dredge it's the worst, since it only stops Dread Return, but we all know maindecks are not meant to beat Dredge anyway, so whatever.
@moorebrother1 why do you think it's even good in Legacy? What does this stop that makes you want to play it, even as a SB card?
For what it's worth, I think there's a fair (but not airtight) argument that this could be a better anti-Outcome sideboard card than Stony Silence, which would immediately put this into some existing 75 card decks.
I think it actually wants the Kambal slot rather than Stony's. Am I wrong?
This card isn’t useless against Dredge. In fact if I were running Lavinia maindeck I wouldn’t board her out.
She’s not a hate card on her own, but she substantially weakens the power of Cabal Therapy and Dread Return. Therapies can still be flashed back to generate zombie tokens, but preventing the Dredge player from stripping your hand of proactive hate cards should not be underestimated.
@evouga It does nothing against Therapy though, because they'll always have at least a Bazaar in play (unless you're also packing Wastelands, but then we're talking about Humans or specific decks, not broad application).
EDIT: oh scratch that. Flashbacked Therapies cost no mana so they get countered. Ok that's good, I didn't catch that
Just the simple fact that the player who has this in play first gets to play thier Fow/Gush/MM for free while the other cannot is so powerful an effect. Even if your opponent has all the removals, if you get to fire off MMs while they are tapped out with multiples in hand, ugh? I honestly like the "can't play spells with cc>lands in play" clause, but the no free spells, one sided nonetheless, insane.
There goes any chance of my bounty of the hunt deck to work
@fsecco depends on the deck but I would run one of each in my Kaya control list. People get too caught up in arguing about which card is better that I think they forget about diminishing returns and the advantage of card diversity when decks run tutors.
Also on cell so might have missed context. If so, mea culpa.
@chubbyrain If you have 2 slots I totally agree. But my point is: suppose you have 1 SB slot for either Kambal or Lavinia. Which would you play? I'm not saying it's Lavinia, but it's not a given which answer is right. I don't think the same is true for Lavinia x Stony. You'd probably play Stony in that SB slot before Lavinia, in the current meta.
@countdabubba said in Single Card Discussion - Lavinia, Azorious Renegade:
Isn't Phyrexian mana still mana whether you pay a blue or pay 2 life?
No it isn't. If you play Dismember over Trinisphere, you either play 1BB, 2B + 2 life or 3 + 4 life.
I think it actually wants the Kambal slot rather than Stony's. Am I wrong?
I wasn't really thinking of any deck that has both Kambal and Stony Silence, I just meant "a card that you run just for the Outcome matchup. All I was trying to say is that the card makes sense as a dedicated anti-Outcome card, just as Stony Silence and Kambal do.
However, I suppose if you actually were playing both Kambal and Stony and wanted to replace one of them, it would be better to draw both Lavinia and Kambal than it would be to draw both Lavinia and Stony (as they get the most of their mileage out of shutting off the same set of Moxes).
If you're using Stony/Kambal for matchups other than Outcome then of course the question gets more complicated.
Dredge cant play dread return, and gets its cabal therapies/hollow ones countered. If it decides to remove it, they lose their bridges. This is definitely not a card you want to see.
Survival hands that are focused on Bazaar, similarly, do not work well against this card. Survival is also fully powered and usually reliant on that mana for its speed.
Shops cares about this if you get turn 1 on the play. It loses all its moxen/crypt/chalice 0 until it manages to get 2 lands to play a Spheres/Thorn. This also slows Rod and Chalice 1.
So every single one of these decks is slowed, significantly depending on the hand and who wins the die role.