Joined
Last Online
Recent Posts
posted in Vintage Tournaments read more

@chubbyrain1 I know. I saw literally nothing about it on Twitter though, while with Weissman it was everywhere. I don't use much Discord for Magic, so maybe I missed it there. Anyway, just though it was odd.

posted in Vintage Tournaments read more

@chubbyrain1 I guess I expected more people commenting this, giving it more visibility. If you compare the reaction to this to the reaction to Weissman's CoP, I think it seems the Vintage community is more tolerant to this stuff than the Old School.

I agree with you on the system stuff.

posted in Vintage Tournaments read more

I for one find it funny that people spend their time and energy complaining about this awesome article by @IamActuallyLvL1 but, as a community, say almost nothing about Andreas Petersen being DQ'ed for Bribery.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

This is a reprint and has been around for years now. (like, 6 years)

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@vaughnbros said in [CMR] Jeweled Lotus:

@fsecco

Yeah, but I’m not talking about 1. I’m talking about 20 better than Lotus and don’t restrict any of them.

Am I supposed to take this seriously?

This discussion is waaaaaay off track. 20 Black Lotuses and unlimited painless Cities of Brass are not even options for the balance of the game. You guys are tripping hard, I'm out. Please don't quote or @ me anymore in this topic, thanks.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@protoaddict I was just connecting both posts I answered in my comment. Givin Triomes the Shockland treatment (making them become Boltlands) wouldn't do anything to the og duals, since they'd just be 1-of in a few decks, with the current manabases basically untouched.
Those cards are so good that in order to reduce their price you need to print strictly superior cards to make them obsolete - but that would also possibly anger people anyway.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@botvinik said in [CMR] Jeweled Lotus:

To be fair that is not true in the long run. If they printed enough better lotuses then the current one would stop seeing play.

Hum.... no it wouldn't. We'd start cutting lands before cutting og Lotus.

@protoaddict said in [CMR] Jeweled Lotus:

Every single time a new dual land comes out, someone says "will this take pressure off the ABUR dual lands" and the answer is almost always no it will not. Half the time people are saying this about 2 color lands that have a restriction and are non fetch-able. I think the only printings that ever did that were the fetch lands but since they still required you to have some number of duals the effect was minimal.

I'll grant you that. If the Triomes didn't come into play tapped, duals would tank. Not that hard, since collectors, Old School and Commander players would still want them, but nonetheless would tank. That wouldn't happen with restricted cards though, specially stuff so over the top like Ancestral or Lotus.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

God, we always go to the SAME arguments whenever a RL discussion happens. Wow.

If they made a "better than" Black Lotus (and restricted it), every deck would play with 2 Lotus. That changes NOTHING.

Come on, I can't believe we're still at this stage in the discussion.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

I'd say this is just better than Notion Thief. The effect is worse, but the mana is so much easier that it makes a ton of difference. Usually just denying the draws to your opponent is already good enough. Just a note that this static is better than Narset, since it's not 1 per turn but just the draw step.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@john-cox well, that's the double-pimped version though. I get your point, but I don't think it counts as a good measure of the card's price.