EDIT: If a couple of results in the last round were different, the Top 8 could have 3 shops, 2 Oath 2 Blue, 1 Dredge or whatever and we wouldn't have been discussing this, would we? That's why we can't be passionate about 1 result.
And if my aunt had a package she’d be my uncle, what’s your point?
I'm not saying I agree with this direct proposal, but isn't the situation you're describing ideal? Why would you want a deck to exist that beats all other decks?
Not really, having a top 3 decks is fine but when they attack from such radically different angles, it's hard to brew a deck to have game against all 3. Not necessarily win but at least have enough of a chance to make the games interesting.
@walking.dude let's assume you do that and create a 3 game meta game of Shops, Mentor and Dredge. Is that any better? Those three decks attack from drastically different angles, and require different sideboard options, creating a situation not unlike what has happened with modern historically where you hedge your bets to face certain decks and just accept you are going to lose against others due to not having enough space.
I, uh, distinctly thought I filled out my deck sheet.
Regardless, anyone who is thinking of coming down should do so next time, the day before (may 6th) there will be a charity legacy tournament for a local player with leukemia in addition to Vintage that Sunday (may 7th)